SIR 2025
Pain Management/MSK
Traditional Poster
Blair Warren, MD
IR Fellow
University of Toronto, Canada
Julian Kwon, None
Research Student
University Health Network, Canada
Alanna Joyce Supersad, MD (she/her/hers)
Interventional Radiology Fellow
University of Toronto - University Health Network (UHN), Canada
Aziz Qazi, MD
Vascular and Interventional Radiologist
University of Toronto, University Health Network, Canada
Twelve patients underwent Cryo and median baseline tumor size was 3.3 cm (range 1.5 - 12.4 cm). Pre-procedural biopsy was performed in 4 cases: 2 intramusclar hemangiomas, 1 suspected low-flow vascular malformation, and 1 angioleiomyoma. Eight (8/12) of the patients had received prior sclerotherapy for their lesions. 100% of patients (12/12) reported lesion-associated pain pre-procedure. Single session Cryo was performed for all patients with lesion dependent cryoablation protocols used. Total freeze time ranged from 8 to 20 minutes. Median follow-up time was 2.5 months (range 1.5 - 8 months). 100% of patients reported improvement in pain post Cryo (12/12, p < .001) at final documented follow-up. One immediate complication was observed, a local hematoma that was managed conservatively. No delayed complications were seen. Follow-up imaging was available for 5/12 patients with no significant reduction in size (median size: 3.3 cm, range 1.3 – 12.3 cm, p = 0.10) to pre-procedural imaging despite all patients stating improved symptoms.
Conclusion:
This early study supports the safety and efficacy of cryoablation for pain management in low-flow vascular malformations and benign vascular tumors. Complete ablation and or radiographic resolution was not required for symptomatic improvement in the observed population, likely related to locoregional neurolysis. Cryoablation represents a treatment alternative for patients who failed treatment of low flow vascular malformations or benign vascular tumors with sclerotherapy.