SIR 2025
Gastrointestinal Interventions
Educational Exhibit
Maxwell Lohss (he/him/his)
Medical Student
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States
Franklin Iheanacho, BA
Medical Student
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States
Anish Ghodadra, MD
Assistant Professor
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology Division, United States
Jared Christensen, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor
University of Michigan, United States
Shantanu Warhadpande, MD
Assistant Professor, Vascular and Interventional Radiology
University of Michigan Medical Center, United States
Daniel L. Kirkpatrick, MD (he/him/his)
Assistant Professor of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
University of Michigan, United States
Small Stones ( < 5mm): After upsizing to a 12-16 French peel-away sheath, aggressive irrigation using a two-catheter technique (flush and balloon catheter) is employed, followed by basket retrieval. The internal diameter of the sheath facilitates direct removal, with residual fragments targeted using a SpyGlass DS Direct Visualization System (Boston Scientific, MA, USA). Medium Stones (5-20mm): Electrohydraulic lithotripsy combined with basket extraction is used with the Spyglass system. Access is upsized as needed, with a 16 French sheath commonly employed. Large Stones ( >20mm): Advanced techniques, including laser lithotripsy via a rigid Olympus endoscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), are often necessary. This requires a 24 French sheath and general anesthesia, necessitating a second procedure [1]. Stones are fragmented and removed using a basket and irrigation. Post-procedure, the cholecystostomy tube is replaced, capped, and assessed at a 2-week follow-up. Lab results and cystic duct patency (assessed via cholangiography) determine if the tube can be removed.
Conclusion and/or Teaching Points: This approach, tailored to stone size, optimizes outcomes in calculous cholecystitis management, reducing the need for repeat interventions. As cholangioscopy becomes more widely adopted, tailoring the approach to stone size shows promise in reducing procedure time and the number of devices required while also minimizing procedural burdens on patients, ultimately speeding up the timeline for tube removal and recovery.