SIR 2025
Interventional Oncology
Educational Exhibit
Warren A. Campbell, IV, MD, PhD
Resident
University of Virginia School of Medicine, United States
Mina S. Makary, MD (he/him/his)
Interventional Radiologist
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, United States
The treatment of solid tumors requires a multimodal interdisciplinary approach with the ablation of solid tumors becoming an integral interventional-oncology driven therapy. With the establishment of minimally invasive percutaneous techniques such as radiofrequency, microwave, and cryoablation as effective curative and palliative therapy, noninvasive techniques such as HIFU and histotripsy offer a noninvasive option for patients.1 While both techniques rely on a targeted ultrasound beam, their mechanism differs in that HIFU relies on rapid targeted thermal coagulative necrosis, where histotripsy creates microbubble cavitations that mechanically disrupts tissue to create an acellular homogenate. However, these techniques have significant limitations due to device size and patient anatomy, penetration of ultrasound waves, interference of bones and gas, and sensitivity of tumor targeting with patient breaths. We discuss the technical advantages and limitations of noninvasive ablation techniques and the evidence supporting their clinical implementation.