SIR 2025
Practice Development
Educational Exhibit
Viknesh S. Kasthuri (he/him/his)
Medical Student
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States
Hannah Clode, MD, MBA
Resident Physician
University of Virginia, United States
J. Fritz F. Angle, MD
Director of Interventional Radiology
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, United States
Daniel Sheeran, MD
Associate Professor
University of Virginia, United States
Luke R. Wilkins, MD, FSIR
Associate Professor
University of Virginia, United States
The RVU system is crucial for determining reimbursement rates for medical procedures and services under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). While hospitals are reimbursed in a bundled manner based on diagnostic-related groups (DRGs), administrators continue to use RVUs internally to quantify productivity. Over the past twenty years, there has been a decrease in RVU values for many vascular & interventional radiology (VIR) procedures and an increase in RVU values for Evaluation & Management (E&M) codes. This trend has coincided with increasing clinical emphasis in VIR. Thus, billing E&M codes for clinical work may allow VIRs to compensate for these cuts and demonstrate the value of a clinically oriented hospital-based IR practice.
Clinical Findings/Procedure Details: We present trends in procedural codes for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt placement (37182), drain placement (49405), and embolization (37243) as well as E&M codes for initial and follow up inpatient encounters from 2003-2024 based on the PFS Relative Value Files. These codes are representative of a variety of inpatient VIR services performed at our hospital. We construct a “clinical bonus” metric of one initial level 2 encounter (99222) and two follow up level 2 encounters (99232) and trend this as well. Overall, the clinical bonus has increased over time and serves to buffer the effects of procedural RVU cuts.
Conclusion and/or Teaching Points:
This analysis of RVU compensation from 2003 to 2024 highlights differences between VIR procedural and E&M codes. The increasing RVU compensation for E&M services suggests that billing for these services, which are commonly already being performed, can help mitigate the impact of RVU reductions and highlight to stakeholders the comprehensive value of a clinical VIR approach in the inpatient setting.