SIR 2025
Interventional Oncology
Scientific Session
Allan Thomas, PhD (he/him/his)
Assistant Professor
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, United States
Tharun T. Alamuri, BS
Medical Student
Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, United States
John Karageorgiou, MD
Assistant Professor
Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, United States
Dan Giardina, MD
Associate Professor
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, United States
Christopher Malone, MD
Associate Professor
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, United States
Lung shunt fraction (LSF) and lung mean dose (LMD) estimates are key aspects of patient selection and treatment planning in 90Y radioembolization. MAA-based planar imaging yields biased and uncertain LSF and LMD estimates {1}, restricting eligible patients and/or therapy. Prior work has outlined 90Y workflows and clinical studies without planar imaging-based LSF {2-4}. Here, >150 glass 90Y cases were assessed to explore strategies for therapy without MAA-based LSF and LMD.
Materials and Methods:
Consecutive HCC cases over 21 months at a single institution were analyzed. Perfused volumes and prescribed radiation dose (MIRD) were tracked. LSF was computed with planar imaging and MAA-SPECT/CT, with corrections at the lung/liver boundary for segregating lung and liver counts in SPECT/CT {1}. Cases were categorized by maximum tumor size: < 4 cm, 4-8 cm, and >8 cm. The impact of LSF methods and values on perfused volume and lung dosimetry was assessed.
Results: A total of 182 cases had usable SPECT/CT data for LSF estimates, with 157 cases proceeding to therapy. Among the 25 cases not treated, 5 were due to high LSF or LMD. LSF values differed among tumor size groups in both calculation methods, with higher values for larger tumors (p≤0.03). No HCC case < 4 cm had a SPECT/CT LSF >5% (none >10% for < 8 cm). Only a single HCC case < 8 cm had a planar LSF >20%. For HCC < 4 cm (simulated LSF: 5%) and 4-8 cm (simulated LSF: 10%), a 20 Gy LMD threshold yielded 98% and 80% of target volumes, respectively, treatable to >400 Gy. A 10% LSF and 20 Gy max LMD enable a chosen target dose (400 Gy) to larger perfused volumes (433 mL) than the clinical standard of 20% and 30 Gy (288 mL).
Conclusion: A modified paradigm is feasible in 90Y radioembolization, without patient-specific, MAA-based LSF and LMD. Simulated max LSF values were informed by SPECT/CT imaging and tumor size analysis. When combined with a conservative 20 Gy max LMD, high target dose ( >400 Gy) is achievable in most all clinically observed perfused volumes for HCC < 8 cm.